Introduction

Unlike any other species, the gray wolf (Canis Lupus) has captivated the minds of humans for centuries. Wolves play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. Wolves do this through the regulation of prey, improving habitat health, and enhancing ecosystem resilience. Wolves help regulate the population of their prey, such as elk, moose and deer by keeping their populations down which prevents overgrazing and overpopulation of species which can have a significant impact on vegetation, ecosystem health and balance. Wolves help reduce pressure from herbivores on the land by helping control their numbers through predation. This helps decrease the risk of soil erosion and loss of plant species diversity which helps to improve habitat health, benefiting other species in the area. For example, a reduction in elk populations can lead to increased vegetation growth, which benefits beavers, songbirds and other species. By helping maintain this balance among species and preventing the dominance of any single species, wolves contribute to ecosystem resilience which is crucial for ecosystems to withstand disturbances such as climate change and habitat loss. (23, 11)

This project aims to offer a comprehensive overview of global wolf population trends, serving as a valuable resource for both current understanding and future research endeavors of wolves around the world. By analyzing and visualizing data from the Living Planet Index, the project seeks to identify countries with significant data gaps, and low or declining wolf populations. Through trend graphs created from the Living Planet Index data, this project works to highlight patterns and shifts in wolf populations over time. By examining these trends, researchers and conservationists can gain insights into the factors influencing wolf populations, such as habitat loss, human-wildlife conflict, climate change, and conservation efforts. By identifying areas where wolf populations are particularly vulnerable and where further research is needed, this project can inform conservation strategies and initiatives aimed at protecting wolf populations and their habitats. (30)

The Importance of Connection: Isle Royale National Park, Michigan

Wolves first arrived in Isle Royale in the winter of 1948 by crossing an ice bridge from Canada. Research has led us to believe that they have been isolated since. After arriving in Isle Royale, their population has varied from 50 wolves to as little as two. In the 1980’s there was a massive decline in the population which continued through the early 90s and was primarily due to human introduced disease called canine-parvovirus. This was a major threat to the population of wolves on this island. Another threat to the well being of this pack was inbreeding since the population was so small and isolated. The decline in the wolf population that can be observed on the graph bellow is due to the combination of disease and inbreeding, but what stopped it? (2, 21)

In 1997, a lone wolf from Canada wandered across the ice bridge that had initially brought wolves to Isle Royal so many years ago. This was a miracle for the wolves of Isle Royale and the dramatic increase that can be seen on the graph below is a result of this event. The wolf, known as number 93 (aka “old grey guy”), served as the new genes that were needed to save the wolf population. In about five years, inbreeding rates dropped dramatically. But, this only lasted so long. Eventually wolf no. 93’s genes began to take over. The question of whether the arrival of no. 93 improved wolf demography has a complicated answer.

Generally, the arrival of no. 93 caused wolf abundance to increase in Isle Royale. But, that increase was inconsistent. It is important to note that this increase happened at a time where the number of moose on Isle Royale was declining rapidly. Moose are an important indicator of food availability for wolves in this area so a decline in wolves would have been expected. Therefore, researchers are confident that the arrival of wolf no. 93 is the reason why the wolf population showed an increase at this time. Research at Isle Royale has been very important for understanding how wolves affect the populations of their prey and how the health of packs is affected by inbreeding and genetics.

The story of wolves arriving and surviving in Isle Royale National park shows how humans and wolves have interacted throughout history. It highlights the importance for wolf packs to be connected to other packs and how this is vital for wolf populations to survive and thrive. Additionally this story illistrates the importance of understanding the mechanism behind population trends and how individual stories are important to getting the full picture. (2, 21)

The Global Picture of Wolf Populations

In some places wolf populations are doing well but in other, they are not. Using the LPI we can observe these trends around the world. The map below shows countries around the world and their most recent reported number of wolves. The red dots show the places that need attention due to either decreasing populations or concerns with the existing data. The green dots indicate that the population is increasing or have a robust population and therefor are stable. Wolf populations are different in every country and have different influencing factors so it is important to investigate each country seperate in addition to looking at them on a global scale.

Populations That Need Attention

Due to low population numbers or a decreasing trend:

Data Concerns

Populations that are doing okay

Future Directions

The goal of this project was to create trend graphs from the data on wolf populations around the globe from the Living Planet Index. This project aimed to briefly describe the trends and influencing factors of population trends for different countries around the world. The hope is that this research will serve as a foundation for future research on wolf populations around the globe.

Population data of the species Canis Lupus was retrieved from the Living Planet Index. Data of all other species was excluded for the purpose of this project. Multiple countries did not have population data and therefor a trend graph was not included. Because of this, future research needs to be done looking at the missing countries. Additionally, some of the methods of data collection could be modified for more accurate measurements. For example, one method used to collect data was asking local farmers about the current wolf population. Based off the numbers shown, it seems like they greatly overestimated the numbers. Because of this it would be beneficial conduct further research on the accuracy of certain methods of data collection.

Overall, this project serves as a unconditional tool for understanding the global status of wolf populations, in order to facilitate informed decision-making, and guiding future research and conservation efforts to ensure the long-term survival of wolves.

The Dataset

The dataset came from the Living Planet Index (LPI) which is an indicator of global biodiversity. The Living Planet Index tracks changes in global biodiversity by monitoring trends in vertebrate populations around the world. It serves as an important indicator of the health of our planet’s ecosystems. The data collected in the Living Planet Index come from various sources, including scientific studies, surveys, and monitoring programs. For the purpose of this research, wolf populations around the world from the LPI was used and all other species data was excluded. Note that trend graphs that had less than five points of data were excluded for the purpose of this project. (30)

References

  1. Adams, J. R., Vucetich, L. M., Hedrick, P. W., Peterson, R. O., & Vucetich, J. A. (2011). Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 278(1723), 3336–3344.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41315078 

  2. Balčiauskas, L., Volodka, H., & Kazlauskas, M. (2007). Wolf conservation and acceptance: comparison of South East Lithuania and North East Poland. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20083047975  

  3. Bazilchuk, N. (2019). Norway culls wolves amid howls of protest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(2), 77–77.https://www.jstor.org/stable/26623743  

  4. Diserens, T. (2023, November 26). Wolves in Białowieża Forest.https://www.tomdiserens.com/wolves-in-bialowieza-forest/

  5. Denali Wolf Buffer. Alaska Wildlife Alliance (AWA). (n.d.). https://www.akwildlife.org/denali-wolf-buffer  

  6. Facts about Wolves - Wildsweden - Wildlife Adventures in Sweden. WildSweden. (n.d.). https://www.wildsweden.com/about/facts-about-wolves   

  7. Fabbri, E., Miquel, C., Lucchini, V., Santini, A., Caniglia, R., Duchamp, C., ... & Randi, E. (2007). From the Apennines to the Alps: colonization genetics of the naturally expanding Italian wolf (Canis lupus) population. Molecular ecology, 16(8), 1661-1671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03262.x

  8. Finland: International Wolf Center. International Wolf Center | Teaching the World about Wolves. (2024a, March 12). https://wolf.org/wow/europe/finland/ (24) 

  9. Kaczensky, P. (1999). Large Carnivore Depredation on Livestock in Europe. Ursus, 11, 59–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3872986

  10. Kecskes, A. (2008). Some questions regarding wolves in Romania. Perspectives of wolves in Central Europe. https://olomouc.hnutiduha.cz/data/publications/47.pdf#page=27  

  11. Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L., & Altendorf, K. B. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79(8), 1401-1409https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z01-094 

  12. The Wolf in the French Alps. Life Wolfalps EU. (2021, June 8).https://www.lifewolfalps.eu/en/the-wolf-in-the-alps/the-wolf-in-the-french-alps/ 

  13. Martin, M. E. (2020). Keepers of the Wolves [Review of Keepers of the Wolves. 2nd Edition, by R. P. Thiel]. Journal of Mammalogy, 101(2), 613–614.https://www.jstor.org/stable/27018559 

  14. Meriggi, A., & Lovari, S. (1996). A Review of Wolf Predation in Southern Europe: Does the Wolf Prefer Wild Prey to Livestock? Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(6), 1561–1571.https://doi.org/10.2307/2404794 

  15. Marucco, F., Pletscher, D. H., Boitani, L., Schwartz, M. K., Pilgrim, K. L., & Lebreton, J.-D. (2009). Wolf Survival and Population Trend Using Non-Invasive Capture—Recapture Techniques in the Western Alps. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(5), 1003–1010. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25623080

  16. Mowbray, S. (2017, June 26). A brief history of wolves in Switzerland. Culture Trip. https://theculturetrip.com/europe/switzerland/articles/a-brief-history-of-wolves-in-switzerland 

  17. Okarma, H., Jȩdrzejewski, W., Schmidt, K., Śnieżko, S., Bunevich, A. N., & Jȩdrzejewska, B. (1998). Home Ranges of Wolves in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland, Compared with Other Eurasian Populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 79(3), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383092  (29)

  18. Pulliainen, E. (1965). Studies on the wolf (Canis lupus L.) in Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 2(4), 215–259.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23730710) (30)

  19. Peter M. Zmyj. (1996). “A Fight to the Finish”: The Extermination of the Gray Wolf in Wyoming, 1890-1930. Montana: The Magazine of Western History, 46(1), 14–25.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4519856 (31)

  20. Pierużek-Nowak, S. (n.d.-b). Association for Nature “Wolf.” Wolves in Western Poland.https://www.polskiwilk.org.pl/en/wolf/wolves-in-western-poland (32)

  21. Robbins, J. (2004). Lessons from the WOLF. Scientific American, 290(6), 76–81.http://www.jstor.org/stable/26047757 (1) 

  22. Richardson, C. (2024, March 12). Romania: International wolf center. International Wolf Center | Teaching the World about Wolves. https://wolf.org/wow/europe/romania/ (17) 

  23. Peterson, R., Drummer, T., & Vucetich, J. (2003). The population biology of Isle Royale Wolves and moose: An overview. Wildlife Monographs.https://isleroyalewolf.org/data/data/home.html#:~:text=Five%20decades%20of%20wolf%2Dmoose%20dynamics&text=In%201980%20the%20wolf%20population,unexpected%20outbreak%20of%20moose%20ticks.

  24. Save our wolves. WWF. (n.d.). https://www.wwf.no/dyr-og-natur/truede-arter/ulv-i-norge/rettssak-for-ulven/save-our-wolves  

  25. Sweden: International Wolf Center. International Wolf Center | Teaching the World about Wolves. (2024, March 12). https://wolf.org/wow/europe/sweden/

  26. Sin T, Gazzola A, Chiriac S, Rîșnoveanu G (2019) Wolf diet and prey selection in the South-Eastern Carpathian Mountains, Romania. PLOS ONE 14(11): e0225424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225424

  27. Switzerland: International Wolf Center. International Wolf Center | Teaching the World about Wolves. (2024b, March 12). https://wolf.org/wow/europe/switzerland/  

  28. The Wolf in Slovenia. Life Wolfalps EU. (2021a, July 8). https://www.lifewolfalps.eu/en/the-wolf-in-the-alps/the-wolf-in-slovenia/#:~:text=From%20then%20on%20the%20expansion,in%20Slovenia%20forming%2014%20packs 

  29. WŁodzimierz Jȩdrzejewski, BogumiŁa Jȩdrzejewska, Henryk Okarma, Krzysztof Schmidt, Karol Zub, Marco Musiani, Prey Selection and Predation by Wolves in BiaŁowieŻa Primeval Forest, Poland, Journal of Mammalogy, Volume 81, Issue 1, February 2000, Pages 197–212, https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0197:PSAPBW2.0.CO;2 

  30. Living planet index. livingplanetindex.org. (n.d.-b). https://www.livingplanetindex.org/search